Re: default value not null not working as expected
Fred Toussi via Hsqldb-user <[email protected]> Fri, 25 May 2018 16:14:24 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.hsqldb.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1527261264.2257549.1385362312.05B86E6F@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
The explicit null in the INSERT statement is not replaced with the default value.
These statements insert the default value:
insert into users (username, start_date, end_date) values ('jtam', DEFAULT, null);
insert into users (username, end_date) values ('jtam', null);
Fred
On Fri, May 25, 2018, at 15:14, Joseph Tam wrote:
> Hi..
>
> I am having trouble with the default value (setting current_timestamp)
> in hsql 2.4.1
>
> when I take off the not null from the column, I can see that it is not
> populating the column with the default value, so the exception is
> valid.
>
> when does the default value get used? thanks in advance!
>
> details:
>
> create table users
> (
> id bigint generated by default as identity(start with 1),
> username varchar(255),
> start_date timestamp default current_timestamp not null,
> end_date timestamp
> );
>
> insert into users (username, start_date, end_date) values ('jtam', null, null);
>
> integrity constraint violation: NOT NULL check constraint;
> SYS_CT_11667 table: USERS column: START_DATE
>
> -joe
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Hsqldb-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hsqldb-user
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot