Re: Possible Bug in IKVMs JNI-Code?

Hi Christian,

Yes, that makes sense. -opt:fields removes unused fields, but it obviously can't see usages via reflection or JNI.

Regards,
Jeroen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Prochnow [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 12:29
> To: Jeroen Frijters; [email protected]
> Subject: AW: Possible Bug in IKVMs JNI-Code?
> 
> Hi Jeroen,
> 
> i finally got it to work. It had nothing todo with Obfuscation. The
> problem was related to the option "-opt:fields" that was passed to ikvmc
> when doing a releaser build.
> 
> If i pass the "-opt:fields" option to ikvmc, JNA initialization fails.
> Without this option everything works fine.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Christian Prochnow
> 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Christian Prochnow
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. September 2014 10:38
> An: 'Jeroen Frijters'; [email protected]
> Betreff: AW: Possible Bug in IKVMs JNI-Code?
> 
> Hi Jeroen,
> 
> thanks for your response. It now works, it had something todo with
> Obfuscation. Sorry to bother you with that.
> 
> 
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Christian
> 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jeroen Frijters [mailto:[email protected]]
> Gesendet: Montag, 8. September 2014 17:27
> An: Christian Prochnow; [email protected]
> Betreff: RE: Possible Bug in IKVMs JNI-Code?
> 
> Hi Christian,
> 
> I can't reproduce that with JNA 4.1.0 and the current IKVM cvs version.
> So you'll need to provide more information.
> 
> Regards,
> Jeroen
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christian Prochnow [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 8, 2014 16:02
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Ikvm-developers] Possible Bug in IKVMs JNI-Code?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > we are using JNA to use some native DLLs via IKVM. While this worked
> > in older versions of IKVM (cant remember which one),
> >
> > it no longer works - could this be an issue in IKVMs JNI code ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > An UnsatisfiedLinkError gets thrown by ..cctor of com.sun.jna.Native:
> >
> >
> >
> > Message: ffi_type_longdouble
> >
> > StackTrace:
> >
> >    bei IKVM.Runtime.JNI.Frame.Leave()
> >
> >    bei com.sun.jna.Native.initIDs()
> >
> >    bei com.sun.jna.Native..cctor()
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Do you have any ideas?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Christian Prochnow
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Z1 SecureMail Gateway Info - http://www.zertificon.com               |
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | - Die Nachricht war weder verschluesselt noch digital unterschrieben |
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> 
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk