[jgroups-dev] Design of a cluster wide atomic counter
Bela Ban <[email protected]> Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:30:53 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.javagroups.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm designing a cluster wide counter, see [1] for details. This is a service which provides a cluster wide named counter, with methods get(), set(), incrementAndGet(), decrementAndGet() and compareAndSet(), similar to AtomicInteger. So if 2 threads have a reference to a named counter "x", then each calling incrementAndGet() on it will ensure that they get unique values. This was suggested by Sanne, who needs something like this in Lucene, but I also want to make it as generic as possible. So I'm wondering if - these methods make sense at all, or if all we want is only really a unique ID generator - whether we need an int or a long, or both as counter - whether there are other use cases for an atomic cluster wide counter Your feedback and 5 cents is appreciated ! [1] https://github.com/belaban/JGroups/blob/JGRP-1366/doc/design/CounterService.txt -- Bela Ban Lead JGroups (http://www.jgroups.org) JBoss / Red Hat ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Javagroups-development mailing list