Re: [jgroups-users] using jgroups on mixed architectures?
Questions/problems related to using JGroups <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:35:30 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.javagroups.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <mailman.25198.1582227460.1535.javagroups-users@lists.sourceforge.net> |
--===============7406286110956597169== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ceb5cd059f03a98d" --000000000000ceb5cd059f03a98d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 1:24 AM Questions/problems related to using JGroups <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > We're using JGroups 4.1.8, channel based on TCP stack. Some customers > > want to use our product where nodes are on different architectures (e.g. > > IBM Power 9 and x86). I don't see any reason that wouldn't work since we > > just need TCP to be available on the machines, but I can only do a > > limited amount of testing. > > Perhaps you can use AWS or Google cloud to get hosts with different > architectures for testing? > Yep, but I don't want to test every combination of machines. If I were paid by the hour maybe.... :) > > > So am asking a hopefully dumb question: assuming the same version of > > everything is used on each node, do you know of any limitations to > > mixing up the node types? > > I haven't tried this, but I don't think this should be a problem Cool, thanks! Cheers, Bobby --000000000000ceb5cd059f03a98d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 1:24 AM Questions= /problems related to using JGroups <<a href=3D"mailto:javagroups-users@l= ists.sourceforge.net">[email protected]</a>> wrote:= <br></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl= e=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);paddin= g-left:1ex">> <br> > We're using JGroups 4.1.8, channel based on TCP stack. Some custom= ers <br> > want to use our product where nodes are on different architectures (e.= g. <br> > IBM Power 9 and x86). I don't see any reason that wouldn't wor= k since we <br> > just need TCP to be available on the machines, but I can only do a <br= > > limited amount of testing.<br> <br> Perhaps you can use AWS or Google cloud to get hosts with different <br> architectures for testing?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yep, but I d= on't want to test every combination of machines. If I were paid by the = hour maybe.... :)</div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" s= tyle=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);pad= ding-left:1ex"> <br> > So am asking a hopefully dumb question: assuming the same version of <= br> > everything is used on each node, do you know of any limitations to <br= > > mixing up the node types?<br> <br> I haven't tried this, but I don't think this should be a problem</b= lockquote><div><br></div><div>Cool, thanks!</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers= ,</div><div>Bobby</div><div>=C2=A0</div></div></div> --000000000000ceb5cd059f03a98d-- --===============7406286110956597169== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============7406286110956597169== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ javagroups-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javagroups-users --===============7406286110956597169==--