Re: [jgroups-users] using jgroups on mixed architectures?

Questions/problems related to using JGroups <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:35:30 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.javagroups.general
Message-ID <mailman.25198.1582227460.1535.javagroups-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
--===============7406286110956597169==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ceb5cd059f03a98d"

--000000000000ceb5cd059f03a98d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 1:24 AM Questions/problems related to using JGroups
<[email protected]> wrote:

> >
> > We're using JGroups 4.1.8, channel based on TCP stack. Some customers
> > want to use our product where nodes are on different architectures (e.g.
> > IBM Power 9 and x86). I don't see any reason that wouldn't work since we
> > just need TCP to be available on the machines, but I can only do a
> > limited amount of testing.
>
> Perhaps you can use AWS or Google cloud to get hosts with different
> architectures for testing?
>

Yep, but I don't want to test every combination of machines. If I were paid
by the hour maybe.... :)


>
> > So am asking a hopefully dumb question: assuming the same version of
> > everything is used on each node, do you know of any limitations to
> > mixing up the node types?
>
> I haven't tried this, but I don't think this should be a problem


Cool, thanks!

Cheers,
Bobby

--000000000000ceb5cd059f03a98d
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 1:24 AM Questions=
/problems related to using JGroups &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:javagroups-users@l=
ists.sourceforge.net">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:=
<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl=
e=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);paddin=
g-left:1ex">&gt; <br>
&gt; We&#39;re using JGroups 4.1.8, channel based on TCP stack. Some custom=
ers <br>
&gt; want to use our product where nodes are on different architectures (e.=
g. <br>
&gt; IBM Power 9 and x86). I don&#39;t see any reason that wouldn&#39;t wor=
k since we <br>
&gt; just need TCP to be available on the machines, but I can only do a <br=
>
&gt; limited amount of testing.<br>
<br>
Perhaps you can use AWS or Google cloud to get hosts with different <br>
architectures for testing?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yep, but I d=
on&#39;t want to test every combination of machines. If I were paid by the =
hour maybe.... :)</div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" s=
tyle=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);pad=
ding-left:1ex">
<br>
&gt; So am asking a hopefully dumb question: assuming the same version of <=
br>
&gt; everything is used on each node, do you know of any limitations to <br=
>
&gt; mixing up the node types?<br>
<br>
I haven&#39;t tried this, but I don&#39;t think this should be a problem</b=
lockquote><div><br></div><div>Cool, thanks!</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers=
,</div><div>Bobby</div><div>=C2=A0</div></div></div>

--000000000000ceb5cd059f03a98d--


--===============7406286110956597169==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


--===============7406286110956597169==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
javagroups-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javagroups-users

--===============7406286110956597169==--