Re: [jgroups-users] Flush + tcp Configuration
Questions/problems related to using JGroups <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Aug 2018 10:56:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.javagroups.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <mailman.6587.1533632208.1384.javagroups-users@lists.sourceforge.net> |
On 07/08/18 10:52, Questions/problems related to using JGroups wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for your answer. You are correct FLUSH isn't the culprit here,
> tcp.bind_addr is. The original tcp.xml provided by jgroups doesn't use
> tcp.bind_addr. I added bind_addr=127.0.0.1 to config and now the nodes
> are finding eachother with or without FLUSH.
OK
> So the way it works is one has to set bind_addr to the same value as in
> initial_hosts, either both pointing to the Loopback address or both
> pointig to a real ip adress and not mixing between these two.
Correct. Alternatively, you could use a different (dynamic) discovery
protocol.
Note that FLUSH is old and (semi-) unsupported; do you really need it?
What properties do you need from the reliable transport?
> Best regards,
> Thorsten Goetzke
>
> Am 06.08.18 um 18:02 schrieb Questions/problems related to using JGroups:
>>
>>
>> On 03/08/18 17:21, Questions/problems related to using JGroups wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am currently trying to get Jgroups running reliable using the tcp
>>> protocol. Now here is a problem that i ran into:
>>> Initially we used the tcp.xml provided by jgroups (assuming that that
>>> config would be a good starting point) and added pbcast.FLUSH.
>>> That actually didn't work. I ran the ReplicatedHasMapDemo on this
>>> config using 2 clients on port 7800 and 7801 respectively. The title
>>> for both clients stayed at 1 Server(s), so the Demo didn't work
>>
>>
>> Using FLUSH or not should not make a diff in discovery; make sure that
>> 'localhost' maps to 127.0.0.1 (as you set your bind address to it),
>> and also verify jgroups.tcp.bind_port maps to 7800 and 7801,
>> respectively.
>>
>> By just adding FLUSH, you probably had a mismatch between
>> TCP.bind_addr/bind_port and TCPPING.initial_hosts
>>
>>
>>> Than I wrote the config below and the Demo did work.
>>> So i am currently somewhat lost. Is this behavior a bug, was the
>>> configuration just wrong, is my new configuration any good...
>>>
>>> I tried to find some information online, apperently once apon a time
>>> a tcp-flush.xml existed but it got removed(?) There seems to be some
>>> information on javagroups-cvs but thats private(?)
>>>
>>> Our Usecase: A very small amount of servers publishing their state,
>>> little traffic but reliablity (especially when servers are
>>> unplugged/rebooted) is pretty important.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Thorsten Goetzke
>>>
>>> <config xmlns="urn:org:jgroups"
>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>> xsi:schemaLocation="urn:org:jgroups
>>> http://www.jgroups.org/schema/jgroups.xsd">
>>>
>>> <TCP
>>> bind_addr="127.0.0.1"
>>> bind_port="${jgroups.tcp.bind_port}"
>>> />
>>>
>>> <!-- it is recommended to add all the hosts on which members of the
>>> cluster will be running to the configuration. -->
>>> <TCPPING async_discovery="true"
>>>
>>> initial_hosts="${jgroups.tcpping.initial_hosts:localhost[7800],localhost[7801],localhost[7802]}"
>>>
>>> port_range="0"/>
>>>
>>> <MERGE3 />
>>> <FD_SOCK/>
>>> <FD/>
>>> <VERIFY_SUSPECT/>
>>> <BARRIER/>
>>> <pbcast.NAKACK2 />
>>> <UNICAST3 />
>>> <pbcast.STABLE />
>>> <pbcast.GMS />
>>> <MFC/>
>>> <FRAG2 />
>>> <RSVP />
>>> <pbcast.STATE_TRANSFER/>
>>> <pbcast.FLUSH/>
>>> </config>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> javagroups-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javagroups-users
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> javagroups-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javagroups-users
--
Bela Ban | http://www.jgroups.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
javagroups-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javagroups-users