Re: Re: ComponentHaus now does full dependency trees!

Hey Mike,

The look and feel need not be the same right.  You can keep the codehaus
l&f for you guys and the comps you generate so you have a brand style
specific to codehaus.  But you could use other style sheets to make it 
have the default maven like look and feel from tigris.

Alex

> 
> From: "Mike Hogan" <[email protected]>
> Date: 2004/01/19 Mon PM 02:13:57 EST
> To: <jcontainer-interest-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
> Subject: Re: ComponentHaus now does full dependency trees!
> 
> Hi Alex,
> 
> > Specifically I was referring to the code that generates the
> > html for the site you gave us a link too.  I really liked the
> > colapsible dependencies and all that stuff.  If basically we
> > could have a tool like that as a plugin we'd all be generating
> > the component reports in the same look and feel as yours.
> 
> I getcha.  It did not occur to me to bundle the content generation into a
> maven plugin, although it certainly is possible.  But I'm wondering if its a
> good move in the grand scheme of things.  Personally I believe its important
> to create as few obstacles as possible to submitting components to
> componenthaus, indeed, there should be positive incentives to use the thing,
> so I would be more inclined to leave this functionality be a componenthaus
> service.  Generating a componenthaus look and feel and having it spread as
> static content across various web sites would be counter productive.  What
> ya reckon?
> 
> Cheers,
> Mike.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jcontainer-interest mailing list
> jcontainer-interest-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org
> http://lists.codehaus.org/mailman/listinfo/jcontainer-interest
>