Re: Joe Walnes feedback on "ComponentHaus now does full dependency trees"
peter royal <[email protected]> Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:08:29 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jcontainer.interest |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jan 21, 2004, at 1:00 PM, Ryan Hoegg wrote: > There are some interesting ideas here. Couldn't the RECOMMENDS > directive be eliminated in favor of just using DEPENDS? And I think > it would make sense to replace SUGGESTS with SUPPORTS, while adding > some kind of priority to supported libraries. One could even allow the > user to specify his own library preferences. RECOMMENDS and SUGGESTS are clarifications on DEPENDS :) in debian, a package doesn't need anything in RECOMMENDS or SUGGESTS, but they are as the name says, either recommended or suggested to accompany the package. of course, there's a lot of grey area when saying what is recommended and suggested :) > Some complications that might arise are > - when to silently use what you've got and when to ask the user for > input > - how to handle version ranges > - I have two levels of PROVIDES hierarchy above: XMLParser -> DOM -> > Xerces. How far can that go? > > Lots of complexity in these ideas, but I'd like to see guided > installation like Joe describes. heck, why not just copy what debian does? :) -pete
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 2.3 KB) - not displayed