Re: General Question about Config Files and IoC
peter royal <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Feb 2004 19:29:12 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jcontainer.interest |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 17, 2004, at 6:52 PM, Chad Woolley wrote:
> What are the reasons for using an interface rather than an plain class
> as the configuration parameter?
You want to make a re-usable component for other people, really.
> I'm sure there are good reasons to use an interface, but I'd like to
> hear some concrete examples, because this is an issue that I think
> about a lot. It seems to me that there is a lot of overhead to
> extract out and maintain a well-documented interface that duplicates
> the real class, "just in case someone ever wants an alternate
> implementation". I have trouble thinking of real examples that
> justify this extra work.
Say there was a ServletContainerComponent that took a
ServletContainerConfig .. if ServletContainerConfig was an interface,
then I would have lots of flexibility in deciding where that
configuration information comes from..
* I could load it from a properties file
* Extract it from a centralized config file for my app
* Load it from a database
* ... etc ...
While all the same could be done if it was a class, I'd then have some
util method whose sole purpose was populating a ServletContainerConfig
object.. with an interface I could create a custom impl and keep the
logic in a more "attached" place, as it were..
-pete