Re: moving towards loom 1.0

peter royal <[email protected]> Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:31:57 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.jcontainer.interest
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Apr 16, 2004, at 6:17 PM, Mauro Talevi wrote:
> I'm tempted to do it - although it would make sense if we then move
> to have separate independent top-level projects for dna and loom.
>
> as already pointed out by peter they are separate project
> and there is the issue of "perception" say for people wanting to
> use just dna and being intimidated by the bulk of the rest of loom.
> it might also encourage other container projects to support
> the dna independently of loom.
>
> so I could start refactoring the codebases to move to the new packages
> and in the mean time pete could start the process of setting up
> the top-level projects.
>
> sounds like a plan?
> (I'd like to do it over the weekend - so shout early if any objections 
> :-)

fine w/me. cvs though, not svn :)
-pete