Re: Sevak Fork.
Paul Hammant <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jcontainer.interest |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ryan, >> >> > Yea, sort of easy. Last time I did it somehow all the doclet tags > didn't get updated. Also, picofication and test coverage are going to > have to be addressed, probably in reverse order. > no probs, we can all get involved with that. > Is anyone besides me looking at using this in the near term? I would > like to spend some time on enhancing the deployer soon, but am having > pangs of guilt about not addressing the aforementioned issues. Might > be nice to split the chores with someone? Maybe even try IM pairing? > (I am sort of a pairing newbie) > I'll also get rid of Sevak in Enterprise Object Broker as soon as I can. It doesn't matter that it is not quite finished dude, we'll all help with little bits. - Paul -- http://www.thoughtworks.com -> The art of heavy lifting. Home for many Agile practicing, Open Source activists...