Re: *Parameterizable*

Hi,

From: "Mircea Toma" <[email protected]>
> I'm trying to understand why Parameterizable+Parameters were kept when the
DNA
> API was created? It looks to me that Parameters are just a particular case
of
> Configuration, which is a flat one. I can understand that Parameters
object
> is very handy but I don't see it as a framework contract. The proof is
that
> Configurable and Parameterizable are mutually excluded.
> Since the DNA is supossed to be a fresh start,  I think that just having a
> conversion tool that would transform a Configuration instance to a
Parameters
> instance and removing the Parameterizable interface would be the correct
> approach.

I have no strong preference either way. I generally dont use it except in
Embeddor like objects and removing it would make a lot of the code simpler.

Anyone else have any preferences?