Re: *Parameterizable*

Mauro Talevi wrote:

> But where would Parameters be defined then?

In a different package. Parameters are what Properties should have been, 
a clean way to represent name-value pairs.

> In order to convert to it must be defined as object somewhere,
> and the only place I can thing of is the api.

Yes, but not the DNA API.

> Are you proposing to keep Parameters and chuck the interface only?

I don't understand the question. I do need the Parameters interface plus 
  a default implementation because it's so handy to work with, when 
having name-value pairs type configuration. The package should have a 
utility that would do:

class ParametersUtil {
	Parameters fromConfiguration(Configuration configuration);
	Parameters fromProperties(Properties properties);
	Parameters fromMap(Map map);
	Properties toProperties(Parameters parameters);
	Map toMap(Parameters parameters);
}

Mircea