Re: *Parameterizable*

Peter Donald wrote:

> 
> Because it means it is more complex than it needs to be. We should make the 
> decision for the user so they dont have to think about it. 

eternal issue in apis - how much decision is left to the user :-)

> Given that Loom 
> does not really support it atm and there is schema validation for it we could 
> probably remove it without harming users.

yup - I have no strong feelings about it being removed.

> Actually the docs say they are and ComponentValidator will object if they are 
> both implemented by the same class ;)

that shows how much I've personally used it ;-)
but which docs are you refering to?