Re: SarTask

Peter Donald wrote:

> Hiya,
> 
> SarTask is essentially just a wrapper around the ant JarTask. I am wondering 
> if it is a class we really need? We could just rework the maven plugin to use 
> the <jar/> task without loosing any functionality. The only loss would be for 
> those who use vanilla ant and use the task. However it is not that much more 
> effort to use a jar task to replace it sooo ....
> 
> How about we axe it? It is currently un-unit tested and we could easily drop 
> it without harm IMHO.
> 

+1 - the only bit of logic (optional logging param) can be cared for 
with jelly.