Re: New build of ComponentHaus
Mike Hogan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jcontainer.interest |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Mauro, Quoting Mauro Talevi <[email protected]>: > Hi Mike, > > nice work! A few comments: > > Mike Hogan wrote: > > I have placed a new build of ComponentHaus here > > http://64.4.141.60/ch/index.html with the following changes: > > > > * Methods are now the unit of searching > > * Better, more IDE-like, presentation of service interface > > (expandable/collapsable Javadoc etc). > > javadoc links are non-clickable. possibly something wrong with the > rendering of the page? Ok, they are clickable only on the "Component Details" pages :-) Like here: http://64.4.141.60/componenthaus/componentDetails.action?id=3 I guess I should make this consistent. > > Click here http://64.4.141.60/componenthaus/searchComponents.action and > > search for "copy file" for example. > > note that searching on "fileCopy" returns no results. > also searching on the name of the component returns none. > It would be useful that if one searched on "utils" it should return all > components which have utils in the name or the description. Agree. I will add these to the todo list. > Finally, a more generic comments. How does componenthaus handle > components which are composed of more than one class? > It seems that you imply a 1-to-1 mapping between class and component. Yes, there is a 1-to-1 between class/interface and "component". Well, more accurately, a component is a collection of ServiceMethod instances. Can you point me towards some source of a component that is split across more than one class? I'll see how that could be made to work. Thanks for the feedback. Mike. > > Cheers, m. > > > _______________________________________________ > jcontainer-interest mailing list > jcontainer-interest-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org > http://lists.codehaus.org/mailman/listinfo/jcontainer-interest >