Re: SarTask

Hi,

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 01:09 am, Mauro Talevi wrote:
> > SarTask is essentially just a wrapper around the ant JarTask. I am
> > wondering if it is a class we really need? We could just rework the maven
> > plugin to use the <jar/> task without loosing any functionality. The only
> > loss would be for those who use vanilla ant and use the task. However it
> > is not that much more effort to use a jar task to replace it sooo ....
> >
> > How about we axe it? It is currently un-unit tested and we could easily
> > drop it without harm IMHO.
>
> +1 - the only bit of logic (optional logging param) can be cared for
> with jelly.

It seems that the changes made broke something. I haven't looked at it exactly 
but nothing other than the environment, assembly, logging, and configuration 
files seem to be included in generated .sar file. Will try to look at it 
further on friday unless you tackle it before then ;)

-- 
Cheers,

Peter Donald
I think the next best thing to solving a 
problem is finding some humor in it. 
                - Frank A. Clark