Re: JDOM 1.1 released!
Jason Hunter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jdom.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mattias Jiderhamn wrote: > Congratulations! > > Now, I would agree it's time to start talking seriously about generics. > > /Mattias Can anyone cite what other projects have done in this situation? Do they just one day say, "Forget Java 1.4" people? I'd be most interested to hear stories from infrastructure library projects. Applications can jump faster than reusable libraries. -jh- P.S. After reading your note, I thought, "What did Mattias say earlier about the subject?" So I played with MarkMail to find out: http://markmail.org/search/?q=from%3Amattias+list%3Ajdom+%22java+5%22 First message popped up: "Can't we get 1.01 first and *then* start discussing generics/Java 5 seriously?" Now your note makes more sense. :) Here's what all's been said before about "Java 5": http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Ajdom+%22java+5%22 _______________________________________________ To control your jdom-interest membership: http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]