Re: JDOM 1.1 released! - thinking JDOM2
Rolf Lear <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jdom.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jason, All. After some consideration, I will volunteer to create a 'pilot' or 'proof-of-concept' Java5 conversion of JDom. I will be happy for it to act as a baseline for simple discussion or perhaps be the foundation of the 'generified' JDom release. I figure I can get something out by the end of next week or so. Rolf Jason Hunter wrote: > Mattias Jiderhamn wrote: >> Congratulations! >> >> Now, I would agree it's time to start talking seriously about generics. >> >> /Mattias > > Can anyone cite what other projects have done in this situation? Do > they just one day say, "Forget Java 1.4" people? I'd be most > interested to hear stories from infrastructure library projects. > Applications can jump faster than reusable libraries. > > -jh- > > P.S. After reading your note, I thought, "What did Mattias say > earlier about the subject?" So I played with MarkMail to find out: > > http://markmail.org/search/?q=from%3Amattias+list%3Ajdom+%22java+5%22 > > First message popped up: "Can't we get 1.01 first and *then* start > discussing generics/Java 5 seriously?" Now your note makes more > sense. :) > > Here's what all's been said before about "Java 5": > > http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Ajdom+%22java+5%22 > _______________________________________________ > To control your jdom-interest membership: > http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected] > _______________________________________________ To control your jdom-interest membership: http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]