Re: JDOM 1.1 released! - thinking JDOM2
Victor Toni <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jdom.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Rolf, maybe we could combine our efforts. I started working already on a Generics enhanced version at the time when 1.1 was released, as mentioned earlier it seems not as trivial as I thought initially ;-) Best regards, Victor Rolf Lear wrote: > Hi Jason, All. > > After some consideration, I will volunteer to create a 'pilot' or > 'proof-of-concept' Java5 conversion of JDom. I will be happy for it to > act as a baseline for simple discussion or perhaps be the foundation > of the 'generified' JDom release. > > I figure I can get something out by the end of next week or so. > > Rolf > > Jason Hunter wrote: >> Mattias Jiderhamn wrote: >>> Congratulations! >>> >>> Now, I would agree it's time to start talking seriously about generics. >>> >>> /Mattias >> >> Can anyone cite what other projects have done in this situation? Do >> they just one day say, "Forget Java 1.4" people? I'd be most >> interested to hear stories from infrastructure library projects. >> Applications can jump faster than reusable libraries. >> >> -jh- >> >> P.S. After reading your note, I thought, "What did Mattias say >> earlier about the subject?" So I played with MarkMail to find out: >> >> http://markmail.org/search/?q=from%3Amattias+list%3Ajdom+%22java+5%22 >> >> First message popped up: "Can't we get 1.01 first and *then* start >> discussing generics/Java 5 seriously?" Now your note makes more >> sense. :) >> >> Here's what all's been said before about "Java 5": >> >> http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Ajdom+%22java+5%22 _______________________________________________ To control your jdom-interest membership: http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]