RE: XML Element name Verifier is overly strict anddoesn't match current XML 1.0 REC

"Michael Kay" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.jdom.general
Message-ID <E95A4E557FAB46A6AEA3E07A6528C67C@Sealion> 
> 
> General consensus seems to be the current behavior is the 
> lesser of two evils.
> 

I don't agree. While I'm definitely among those who think the XML spec
shouldn't have been changed in this way, I think the best way of minimising
the damage is for everyone now to move forward.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/ 

_______________________________________________
To control your jdom-interest membership:
http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.