Re: Parsing a MODS-document with validation fails
"Bradley S. Huffman" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jdom.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANq13Gu-rCw0oDgcHMcyOLqSCpoDiV-Y+tt-Ev1CMiTRpzCqRQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Which version of JDOM? My first guess is it is something in XMLOutputter. On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Thomas Scheffler <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > if I parse a valid MODS document with XML Schema validation, JDOM changes > attributes as it handles default values of schema not correctly (by ignoring > the namespace). > > Here is a short code to demonstrate this: > > SAXBuilder builder = new SAXBuilder(true); > builder.setFeature("http://xml.org/sax/features/namespaces", true); > builder.setFeature("http://xml.org/sax/features/namespace-prefixes", true); > builder.setFeature("http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema", > true); > > Document document = builder.build(new > URL("http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/download/fedora_content/show_pretty/ac:111060/CONTENT/ac111060_description.xml")); > XMLOutputter xout = new XMLOutputter(Format.getPrettyFormat()); > xout.output(document, System.out); > > Here is a result fragment: > > <name type="simple"> > <namePart type="family">Edwards</namePart> > <namePart type="given">Stephen A.</namePart> > <role> > <roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm> > </role> > <affiliation>Columbia University. Computer Science</affiliation> > </name> > > If you look at the original document you can see, that @type of name is > "personal". The "simple" comes from the xlink XML-Schema that was included > by the MODS-Schema. Therefor the result fragment should look like this: > > <name type="personal" xlink:type="simple"> > <namePart type="family">Edwards</namePart> > <namePart type="given">Stephen A.</namePart> > <role> > <roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm> > </role> > <affiliation>Columbia University. Computer Science</affiliation> > </name> > > If I use DOM from Java this is done correctly (but a bit ugly as it does not > use the namespace prefix already defined). > > Could someone just fix this, please? > > Regards, > > Thomas Scheffler > _______________________________________________ > To control your jdom-interest membership: > http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected] > _______________________________________________ To control your jdom-interest membership: http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]