Re: JDOM2 Update

Noel Grandin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.jdom.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Rolf wrote:
> In order to have a clear and documented migration path from JDOM to JDOM2
> we need to know and document all significant changes in the API.
There is no need to keep track of this. There are various tools for generating an API diff between 2 versions of a
software component.
> No work will be done on any 'generics' or other API modifications until
> the JUnit tests have adequate coverage for regression purposes.
That's a fine way to discourage interest. Most people don't like writing tests at best.
Making us write tests for someone else's 3-year old code is just going to stifle contributions.



Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html


_______________________________________________
To control your jdom-interest membership:
http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.