Re: XPath and Jaxen
Rolf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jdom.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Indeed, that's the way I see it (and it's also what I am doing to get the testing done. It is also what I see as the 'logical' way it should be done, which is also why I am asking... why was it not done that way first time around? Rolf On 12/09/2011 1:52 AM, Thomas Scheffler wrote: > Am 12.09.2011 02:43, schrieb Rolf: >> What is the right way to do this migration...? > > Hi, > > as I understand the Jaxen code correctly you have to implement the > Navigator interface to add support to any library. > > I would conclude that you have to move the JDOM-Jaxen-Code completely to > JDOM. This way there is no circle dependency anymore and no need to fork > any version of Jaxen here. As JDOM2 is an different library than JDOM > and you are free to do this. JDOM2 would than depend on Jaxen and that's > it. > > regards, > > Thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > To control your jdom-interest membership: > http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected] > _______________________________________________ To control your jdom-interest membership: http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]