Re: jdom 1.1.2 references missing maven artifact

Hi Don.

to educate me a bit better (so I do it better next time), can you answer
the following for me:

- Where do the cobertura and findbugs dependencies come from? Jaxen? I
happen to use both in JDOM, did they come from there?

- Should I just 'remove' the dependency on Jaxen, and 'document' it
somewhere that if you want to use XPath you need Jaxen?

- If I should keep the Jaxen 'dependency', should I mark it optional?

- if I should keep the Jaxen 'dependency', should I add these exclusions
to the JDOM pom's jaxen dependencies so that they are already there?

- is there anything else you can see that is 'broken' with the Maven
deploy?

Thanks

Rolf

On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:15:34 -0800, Don Corley <[email protected]> wrote:
> I went ahead and deployed the jaxen 1.1.3 artifact that was missing.
> 
> Unfortunately, there are a few downsteam artifacts that still can't be
> found, so you'll need to exclude them.
> 
> To include jdom 1.1.2 as a dependency in your maven project, just add:
> <dependency>
>    <groupId>org.jdom</groupId>
>    <artifactId>jdom</artifactId>
>            <version>1.1.2</version>
>    <scope>compile</scope>
>    <exclusions>
>      <exclusion>
>        <groupId>maven-plugins</groupId>
>        <artifactId>maven-cobertura-plugin</artifactId>
>      </exclusion>
>      <exclusion>
>        <groupId>maven-plugins</groupId>
>        <artifactId>maven-findbugs-plugin</artifactId>
>      </exclusion>
>    </exclusions>
> </dependency>
> 
> I reworked the downstream project file, so this should be fixed in the
next
> version.
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> Don
_______________________________________________
To control your jdom-interest membership:
http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]