Re: JDOM2 and Runtime Exceptions

Noel Grandin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.jdom.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
You are correct, how exactly to use exceptions is still a matter of 
taste and debate.

That being said, I prefer programmatic problems to be unchecked.

And I don't think backwards compatibility w.r.t. exceptions is such a 
big deal - JDOM2 already requires quite a few changes.
Changing my catch block and throws clauses is not a big deal, and it's 
not the kind of change that would subtly corrupt my code either.

On 2012-01-19 22:41, Rolf Lear wrote:
> Hi Leigh, all
>
> Despite my earlier mail referencing 'Effective Java', I went further in to
> the book, and it then contradicts itself in "item 59" which claims "Avoid
> unnecessary use of checked exceptions". It quite clearly contradicts the
> "item 58".... so even Bloch is not able to clearly define a 'rule' for
> checked exceptions.
>
> This process has been an exercise of frustration. It is quite clear that
> there is no clear 'right' way of doing things. There is no clear
> 'precedent' on how it should be done either.
>

Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html


_______________________________________________
To control your jdom-interest membership:
http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.