Re: JDOM2 and Runtime Exceptions
Noel Grandin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jdom.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You are correct, how exactly to use exceptions is still a matter of taste and debate. That being said, I prefer programmatic problems to be unchecked. And I don't think backwards compatibility w.r.t. exceptions is such a big deal - JDOM2 already requires quite a few changes. Changing my catch block and throws clauses is not a big deal, and it's not the kind of change that would subtly corrupt my code either. On 2012-01-19 22:41, Rolf Lear wrote: > Hi Leigh, all > > Despite my earlier mail referencing 'Effective Java', I went further in to > the book, and it then contradicts itself in "item 59" which claims "Avoid > unnecessary use of checked exceptions". It quite clearly contradicts the > "item 58".... so even Bloch is not able to clearly define a 'rule' for > checked exceptions. > > This process has been an exercise of frustration. It is quite clear that > there is no clear 'right' way of doing things. There is no clear > 'precedent' on how it should be done either. > Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html _______________________________________________ To control your jdom-interest membership: http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]