Re: suggested JDOM2 improvements

Leigh L Klotz Jr <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.jdom.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
No problem, I understand now.
BTW I've decided my desire to replace the XPath factory to work around a 
Jaxen bug is in fact a problem with Jaxen instead; it's just that I have 
no belief I can get the Jaxen bug fixed ever.

Since you're re-working the XPath class I'll hold off on any more 
uninformed comments...

Leigh.


On 01/20/2012 03:19 PM, Rolf Lear wrote:
>
> Hi Leigh
>
> I think we are both missing something here.
>
> In JDOM2 I'm convinced that XPath is deprecated... so, while it is still
> in the ALPHA at the moment it will have a viable replacement by the next
> ALPHA.
>
> We'll make sure the replacement is 'good' for custom/other XPath backend
> implementations.
>
> Give me a day to polish up a proposed replacement. I think you are
> missing the tricks of the XPathFactory code in the current ALPHA
> release, but there's not much point in fighting it when it is going to
> change anyway.
>
> Rolf
>

_______________________________________________
To control your jdom-interest membership:
http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.