Re: JDOM 1.x release schedule

Leigh L Klotz Jr <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.jdom.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
You might consider 1.1.1 to be the "stable" build Olivier suggested and 
go through at least a release candidate before declaring 1.1.3.
I found the problem I reported immediately, so probably 1.1.2 hasn't had 
enough testing by installed-base users.

Leigh.

On 01/25/2012 06:42 AM, Rolf Lear wrote:
>
> Hi All.
>
> Given the bug fix pending in the JDOM 1.1.x stream I believe a new 
> release
> of the JDOM 1.1.x is required.
>
> On the other hand I do not want to be releasing 1.1.x versions for every
> issue that arises.
>
> I think a compromise schedule is viable, and it goes something like this:
>
> 1. build the current JDOM 1.x stream with the current bug fix in it and
> post it on the github download page. Call it
> JDOM.1.1.x.hotfix.2012.01.25.zip
> 2. if any additional bug fixes are needed another hotfix package will be
> built.
> 3. at some fixed point in time we schedule a formal 1.1.3 release that
> contains all the fixes.
> 4. if any bug comes up that is considered to be 'critical' an
> earlier-than-schedule release could be made.
>
> In this case, I think 1st March 2012 is a good candidate date... 5 weeks
> from now.
>
> Later today I will build the current JDOM 1.x code base as
> JDOM.1.1.x.hotfix.2012.01.25 and I will post it to github.
> If any other issues arise I will create hotfix updates to address them.
> On March 1st I will rebuild the JDOM code again as 1.1.3 and do the 
> formal
> release process to www.jdom.org as well as maven-central.
>
> Does this sound like a viable process?
>
> Rolf
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]
>

_______________________________________________
To control your jdom-interest membership:
http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.