Re: JDOM 1.x release schedule
Leigh L Klotz Jr <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jdom.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You might consider 1.1.1 to be the "stable" build Olivier suggested and go through at least a release candidate before declaring 1.1.3. I found the problem I reported immediately, so probably 1.1.2 hasn't had enough testing by installed-base users. Leigh. On 01/25/2012 06:42 AM, Rolf Lear wrote: > > Hi All. > > Given the bug fix pending in the JDOM 1.1.x stream I believe a new > release > of the JDOM 1.1.x is required. > > On the other hand I do not want to be releasing 1.1.x versions for every > issue that arises. > > I think a compromise schedule is viable, and it goes something like this: > > 1. build the current JDOM 1.x stream with the current bug fix in it and > post it on the github download page. Call it > JDOM.1.1.x.hotfix.2012.01.25.zip > 2. if any additional bug fixes are needed another hotfix package will be > built. > 3. at some fixed point in time we schedule a formal 1.1.3 release that > contains all the fixes. > 4. if any bug comes up that is considered to be 'critical' an > earlier-than-schedule release could be made. > > In this case, I think 1st March 2012 is a good candidate date... 5 weeks > from now. > > Later today I will build the current JDOM 1.x code base as > JDOM.1.1.x.hotfix.2012.01.25 and I will post it to github. > If any other issues arise I will create hotfix updates to address them. > On March 1st I will rebuild the JDOM code again as 1.1.3 and do the > formal > release process to www.jdom.org as well as maven-central. > > Does this sound like a viable process? > > Rolf > _______________________________________________ > To control your jdom-interest membership: > http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected] > _______________________________________________ To control your jdom-interest membership: http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]