Re: Why are version numbers so complicated?
Paul Libbrecht <[email protected]> Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:49:05 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jdom.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Why not make a package org.jdom with artifactId jdom version 2.0.0 containing both packages (org.jdom and org.jdom2) with every class in org.jdom deprecated? It's a bit more work but it might offer a good incentive for the move. paul PS: no big issue about the other decisions. Le 17 mars 2012 à 16:45, Jason Hunter a écrit : > In Maven I'm OK either way. If it's under the artifact name jdom2 we avoid accidental breakage, but we will have people for years initiating new projects against jdom instead of jdom2 just by accident. _______________________________________________ To control your jdom-interest membership: http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]