Re: 2.0.0 usage
Grzegorz <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:02:39 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jdom.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+DoOidae5Yf3sKCrm12Eu55JUrCCkU=aOYWWxmiGpo7JDFguA@mail.gmail.com> |
Started to use it, no problems yet. I would not be very hasty in releasing the first bug fix to a brand-new major version. It would suggest that it is already well tested. Staying at 2.0.0 suggests correctly - it is new, try it, but be sure something will not work optimal. Regards, GK 2012/4/13, Olivier Jaquemet <[email protected]>: > Hi Rolf, > > Regarding usage, 2 custom answers for me : > - Tried it when it was in beta, had no apparent problems (which > indicates we have a "basic usage" of the library). > - Going to try it *more* when there's time. > > Regarding next release date : > I am shared between "release often" and "release when there is a major > bug or enough small bug discovered". > What we usually do for our software is provide more frequent release in > the beginning of a new major version, even if the bug is not really > major or critical, and then slow down. It marks our implication in the > new release and I think it gives more confidence to the user that we > provide rapid fixes (though the opposite could be said as user might > perceive this frequent release as a proof of buggy release...) > > Olivier > > On 12/04/2012 20:21, Rolf Lear wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> I know it is soon, but I am trying to budget time and resources for 2.0.1. >> >> Already there is a bug identified in 2.0.0, and it needs to be >> resolved.... but, how long should I wait to see if there are other bugs? >> >> Thus I would like as much feedback as possible whether you are using JDOM >> 2.x or not. Think of it as a 'poll', and all I need (for now) are simple >> things like: >> - Yes, using it, no problems >> - Yes, using it, some problems, but will keep going. >> - Tried it, had problems, gave up. >> - Going to try it when there's time. >> - Going to try it when it is more 'stable'. >> - I would try it if it had feature XYZ. >> - Not planning on trying it - happy with JDOM 1.x >> >> If you feel like creating your own answer, or expanding on your reply, or >> anything, please do. >> >> Thanks >> >> Rolf >> _______________________________________________ >> To control your jdom-interest membership: >> http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected] >> > > -- > Olivier Jaquemet<[email protected]> > Ingénieur R&D Jalios S.A. - http://www.jalios.com/ > @OlivierJaquemet +33970461480 > > > _______________________________________________ > To control your jdom-interest membership: > http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected] > _______________________________________________ To control your jdom-interest membership: http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]