Fwd: Re: 2.0.0 usage

Hi,

Yes, using it, no problems

Regards,
Benjamin


On 12.04.2012 20:21, Rolf Lear wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I know it is soon, but I am trying to budget time and resources for 2.0.1.
>
> Already there is a bug identified in 2.0.0, and it needs to be
> resolved.... but, how long should I wait to see if there are other bugs?
>
> Thus I would like as much feedback as possible whether you are using JDOM
> 2.x or not. Think of it as a 'poll', and all I need (for now) are simple
> things like:
>  - Yes, using it, no problems
>  - Yes, using it, some problems, but will keep going.
>  - Tried it, had problems, gave up.
>  - Going to try it when there's time.
>  - Going to try it when it is more 'stable'.
>  - I would try it if it had feature XYZ.
>  - Not planning on trying it - happy with JDOM 1.x
>
> If you feel like creating your own answer, or expanding on your reply, or
> anything, please do.
>
> Thanks
>
> Rolf
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]

_______________________________________________
To control your jdom-interest membership:
http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAwAGBQJPiA+EAAoJEFIsy9OLZs8CDegIALLCh6XDhhj1kJD6+cAUiGol
IumKfHzlqm02qHHf8YwUnBHEw3rW/obsOpXhRK9MsOfh0pJD9vSTpXfgNzyG/g7y
IWyCFwaKd+Z/aPPgLvUSAv+ikS3V4jgwqOjc/Cx8Rsh7BHWa3JKQsTnNUC4HUAu1
NiICI/ENzxBibYK+yjVsxdYbk4xfxqPNmrOoj6W39Gq4ilMwnryioPm9AqhOpNNU
2Upv2jJdC+wBKMp63K0nvBA9vK9Pc+A9qa0Y3cf1bNYzBP1rSsC/yh+cCrGCs02T
wu7dvXyW6EUAGpUvqwXhz2s040C9OJwBs1vP+hAAy12uF1uTHnUXxxix6eNxZzc=
=XLYk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----