Re: Fwd: XML 1.1 -- Please stab me with a dull knife and trample my dead body

Maybe what JDOM needs is extensions, like .Net

http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2009/08/26/how-to-deal-with-invalid-characters-in-soap-responses-from-asp-net-web-services.aspx


Just nasty, this xml thing.

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Rolf Lear <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Hi Wilf.
>
> You are getting your wires crossed..... In your mail you referenced parsed
> and external entities. These have nothing to do with PCDATA (parsed
> character data - regular XML text), and CDATA (unparsed character data -
> <![CDATA[ ... ]]> )
>
> Michael was answering your question based on the 'entities', where as you
> want the details on the 'PCDATA' and the 'CDATA'.
>
> So, forget about the 'entity' references, and focus on the valid character
> data for XML.
>
> The only difference between CDATA (character blocks between <![CDATA[  and
> ]]> ) and PCDATA (element 'text'), is that the XML Parser will look for
> '<' and '&' characters in PCDATA, but not in CDATA.
>
> With the correct escaping, all CDATA content can be expressed as PCDATA
> content.
>
> This does not help you though, because not all Java 'char' characters are
> valid Unicode characters, and thus not all chars are valid as either CDATA
> or PCDATA.
>
> In XML 1.0 this distinction was clear.
>
> In XML 1.1 I am not certain how to interpret the difference between
> 'Chars' and 'RestrictedChars': http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/#charsets
>
> JDOM takes a 1.0 perspective on Characters... which may be a problem, but
> it is not going to solve your issues even if it supports 1.1 chars.
>
> Rolf
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 08:45:33 -0700, Canadian Wilf <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Then what is the proper mode:
> >
> > Element e = new Element("foo")
> >
> > Should I do this:
> >
> > e.setText(string_of_sanitized_data_with_illegal_characters_escaped);
> >
> > or
> >
> > e.setText(any_text);
> >
> >
> > Wilf
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Michael Kay <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>  No, that's all wrong. The contents of an unparsed entity are always an
> >> external resource, they are never part of a text or attribute node.
> >> Parsed
> >> entities do become part of the content, but they must always use the
> XML
> >> character set.
> >>
> >> Michael Kay
> >> Saxonica
> >>
> >> On 07/09/2012 13:10, Canadian Wilf wrote:
> >>
> >> According to the xml 1.1 spec:
> >>
> >>  4 Physical Structures ...
> >>> [Definition: An *unparsed entity* is a resource whose contents may or
> >>> may not be text <http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/#dt-text>, and if text,
> may
> >>> be other than XML. Each unparsed entity has an associated
> >>> notation<http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/#dt-notation>,
> >>> identified by name. Beyond a requirement that an XML processor make
> the
> >>> identifiers for the entity and notation available to the application,
> >>> XML
> >>> places no constraints on the contents of unparsed entities.]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  AND
> >>
> >>  Entities may be either parsed or unparsed. [Definition: The contents
> of
> >>> a *parsed entity* are referred to as its replacement
> >>> text<http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/#dt-repltext>;
> >>> this text <http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/#dt-text> is considered an
> >>> integral part of the document.]
> >>
> >> [Definition: An *unparsed entity* is a resource whose contents may or
> may
> >>> not be text <http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/#dt-text>, and if text, may be
> >>> other than XML. Each unparsed entity has an associated
> >>> notation<http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/#dt-notation>,
> >>> identified by name. Beyond a requirement that an XML processor make
> the
> >>> identifiers for the entity and notation available to the application,
> >>> XML
> >>> places no constraints on the contents of unparsed entities.]
> >>> Parsed entities are invoked by name using entity references; unparsed
> >>> entities by name, given in the value of *ENTITY* or *ENTITIES*
> >>>  attributes.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  In the current JDOM version, Element method setText(string) and also
> >> addContent(CDATA) refuses text that contains illegal characters. It is
> >> treating the data provided as 'parsed' when it should by the spec be
> >> treating it as free content.
> >>
> >>  I understand:
> >>
> >>   1) The xml 1.1 spec defines a parsed entity as its 'replacement
> text'.
> >>
> >>  2) Replacement text' would refer to the actual textual makeup of a
> >> serialized Element, not the data an Element holds in a Text content
> >> element
> >>
> >>
> >>  Then, if the above is true, the current implementation is actually
> wrong
> >> to verify data.
> >>
> >>  I propose that JDOM stop verifying data set as Element text and CDATA
> >> and leave it to the xerces (or whatever) to make sure the document is
> >> proper 1.1.
> >>
> >>  Am I understanding everything correctly?
> >>
> >>  Thoughts?
> >>
> >>  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Canadian Wilf <[email protected]>
> >> Date: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:52 PM
> >> Subject: XML 1.1 -- Please stab me with a dull knife and trample my
> dead
> >> body
> >> To: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >>  I just learned that in order to safely use JDOM2, I will need to
> >> sanitize my Element .setText(string) so that the parsed data does not
> >> contain verboten characters under the XML 1.1 spec.
> >>
> >>  I have an ascii processor and it needs to be able to use xml as a
> >> document format. Unfortunately, not all ascii is allowed in an Element
> >> text.
> >>
> >>  Stab me with a dull knife and trample my dead body. But ..... please
> >> please please don't make me sanitize all my data before putting it into
> >> XML
> >> Elements.
> >>
> >>  1) It makes my programming task much more cumbersome because I must
> >> ensure not to feed any of the new verboten and doomed ascii/UTF-8
> >> characters to store as xml text.
> >>
> >> 2) No one uses xml 1.1, do they?
> >>
> >>  3) It slows down the parsing (a very small amount) with all the
> element
> >> text checking.
> >>
> >>  Now that JDOM2 is xml 1.1 compatible, is there any turning back. Can
> >> this be undone?
> >>
> >>  Does everyone understand that their software will bust if data
> provided
> >> as text is not adhering to the new standard?
> >>
> >>  What about you? How do you deal with it when using the libraries?
> >>
> >>  Wilf
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> To control your jdom-interest
> >>
> membership:
> http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> >> http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]
> >>
>

_______________________________________________
To control your jdom-interest membership:
http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/[email protected]