JESS: reasoning about Jess Rules

Dear all,

What I want to do with Jess is to reason about the LHS and RHS rules, to 
know for example, about the rules whitch conclude to the same RHS and 
which are activated. It's a kind of conflicting set for the same conclusion.
Is there any way to deal with the RHS as a Jess fact?

Thanks in advance,
Nadia

begin:vcard
fn:Nadia Abchiche-Mimouni
n:Abchiche-Mimouni;Nadia
org;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:Universit=C3=A9 d'Evry;Laboratoire IBISC & D=C3=A9partement GEII (IUT)
email;internet:[email protected]
title;quoted-printable:Ma=C3=AEtre de Conf=C3=A9rences
version:2.1
end:vcard