Re: JESS: Time-varying methods inside a and in a test

It would be interesting to see these functions.

Basically I'm inclined to believe that this is not possible without some
weird side effect achieved by one of the functions.

-W


On 18 July 2011 19:42, Skeptic . <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> r1 is fired, r1b is not (which is the desired behavior).
>
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: JESS: Time-varying methods inside a and in a test
> > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:06:56 -0400
> >
> > Although they do compile into different networks, the effect should be
> > basically the same. What's the difference you're observing?
> >
> >
> > On Jul 18, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Skeptic . wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there a good reason why a rule like this :
> > >
> > > (defrule r1
> > > [...]
> > > (test (and (time-varying call1) (time-varying call2))
> > > =>
> > > [...])
> > >
> > > behave differently than one like this :
> > >
> > > (defrule r1b
> > > [...]
> > > (test (time-varying call1))
> > > (test (time-varying call2))
> > > =>
> > > [...])
> > >
> > > Thanks !
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > Ernest Friedman-Hill
> > Informatics & Decision Sciences          Phone: (925) 294-2154
> > Sandia National Labs
> > PO Box 969, MS 9012                            [email protected]
> > Livermore, CA 94550                             http://www.jessrules.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [email protected]'
> > in the BODY of a message to [email protected], NOT to the list
> > (use your own address!) List problems? Notify
> [email protected]
>