Re: [jetty-user] requests hanging, then behaving normally for 30 seconds, then hanging

Alexei Serov <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:51:35 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.jetty.support
Message-ID <CAE=jfLbpOHCKe1jSH3hwkWsYrk9vCo+Do0er=x4ACu4MmvCE9g@mail.gmail.com>
unsubscribe

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Greg Steffensen
<[email protected]>wrote:

> I'm seeing some odd behavior in a custom app that embeds Jetty.  If a
> server hasn't received a request recently, it will often take a very long
> time to process the request- between 5 and 60 seconds- even for trivial
> hello world handlers.  Then, once that request has returned, the server
> will process requests at a normal, rapid rate, for precisely 30 seconds,
> and then the next request received will take a long time again.  I'm
> actually running two different custom webservers based on Jetty... they
> share a lot of code, including the "hello world" handler that I'm testing
> with.  But only one is experiencing this problem, and the most significant
> difference between the two that I can see is that the problematic one uses
> BlockingChannelConnector, while the ok one uses the default
> SelectChannelConnector.  Other than the non-default Connector, I'm not
> doing anything remotely interesting in the server setup- I'm not using any
> Jetty XML files for configuration, and am essentially just doing a stock
>
> Server customServer = new CustomServer(PORT);
> customServer.start();
> customServer.join();
>
> I'm using BlockingChannelConnector for some servers because these server
> variants should be receiving low numbers of persistent HTTP 1.1
> connections.  The other SelectChannelConnector server (which functions as a
> load balancer for the BlockingChannelConnector servers) will function as a
> more normal webserver receiving requests from lots of clients, so
> SelectChannelConnector seemed more appropriate.
>
> So- does anyone know if 30 seconds is the default value for any Jetty
> settings that might be related to behavior like this?  Or has anyone seen
> similar behavior?
>