Re: [rvm-research] GSoC 2013 Call for Jikes RVM project proposals
Erik Brangs <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jikes.rvm.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On 21.03.2013 00:15, Eliot Moss wrote: >>> - Opt compiler for 64-bit x86 >>> >> >> x64 support would certainly be a great addition if we can find a student >> with suitable skills. IMHO such a project should have a strong focus on >> regularly merging code to mainline. If that does not happen, we'll end >> up in the same situation that we're in right now: we have contributions >> for x64 support (e.g. DaFeng's patch set for RVM-977 and potentially >> additional code in MRP) but we're too short on time to merge it. > > I am not sure exactly what you're referring to (a patch set number does > not connote as I write), but this is mostly about getting the opt compiler > rules (and support) written. I was assuming an otherwise-working 64-bit > environment. Sorry for not being more clear. What I meant is the following: The problem is not that we lack code for x64 baseline and opt compilers (there is code for both in the RVM-977 patch set). The problem is that the code is not on mainline because nobody had enough time to do the required work. We wouldn't gain anything from a GSoC project for x64 if the code is not merged and we haven't had good experiences with trying to do the merge at the end of GSoC. Therefore a student would have to merge code to the trunk on a regular basis. Kind regards, Erik Brangs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar