Re: [rvm-research] GSoC 2013 Call for Jikes RVM project proposals

Erik Brangs <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.jikes.rvm.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On 21.03.2013 00:15, Eliot Moss wrote:
>>> - Opt compiler for 64-bit x86
>>>
>>
>> x64 support would certainly be a great addition if we can find a student
>> with suitable skills. IMHO such a project should have a strong focus on
>> regularly merging code to mainline. If that does not happen, we'll end
>> up in the same situation that we're in right now: we have contributions
>> for x64 support (e.g. DaFeng's patch set for RVM-977 and potentially
>> additional code in MRP) but we're too short on time to merge it.
> 
> I am not sure exactly what you're referring to (a patch set number does
> not connote as I write), but this is mostly about getting the opt compiler
> rules (and support) written.  I was assuming an otherwise-working 64-bit
> environment.

Sorry for not being more clear. What I meant is the following: The
problem is not that we lack code for x64 baseline and opt compilers
(there is code for both in the RVM-977 patch set). The problem is that
the code is not on mainline because nobody had enough time to do the
required work.

We wouldn't gain anything from a GSoC project for x64 if the code is not
merged and we haven't had good experiences with trying to do the merge
at the end of GSoC. Therefore a student would have to merge code to the
trunk on a regular basis.


Kind regards,

Erik Brangs

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.