Re: Re[2]: SVN migration

Actually in regards to logging i'm thinking of just switching to
java.util.logging, that way we remove the dependency on log4j, and just
rely on jdk1.4, what do you guys think ?

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:12:57 +0200, "Nikita" <write_to_zig-JGs/[email protected]>
said:
> Hello Michael,
> 
> I didn't mean that logging is bad (though it makes an extra
> dependency). I meant that couldn't provide patches as I changed much
> code (like removing loggers)
> 
> Sorry for my English!
> 
> 
> MK> Also if we can improve logging I am happy with input about that.
> 
> >> faster (from 20 sec to 12). This optimizations include deleting of
> >> loggers that is not good for the library.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
>  Nikita
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
> language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live
> webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
> territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> jrpm-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jrpm-devel


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642