Re: Default Template discussion
Janne Jalkanen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jspwiki.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I couldn't agree more with this. But that requires a rethink of the > entire > problem, doesn't it? > In this case a dedicated right aligned pageactions block wouldn't > be needed > would it? Well, I guess my problem is that they *both* change now. But with the right-aligned part it doesn't really matter that much, because it's not visually that strong. How about if we just had a tab -bar, and then put all the other stuff in the dropdown? | *View* | Attach | Edit | Info | More... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ Then, with info it would become | View | Attach | Edit | *Info* | More... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ | History | Links |Diff | ------------------------------------------- Then the More... menu would contain something like * Log in / Log out (we should probably put the login/logout also under the G*day greeting, 'cos that's a logical place) * Preferences * Create new group ---- * Front Page * Any other page that the admin wants, grabbed off a list from somewhere I think that the stuff that you need often should be easily available, but things like "login/logout" you don't really do that often. > aha reaction later. However, with that said, I still believe that > the best > designs dont need to be explained to a user. Yes, agreed. /Janne