Re: Clarification on release notes needed

Correct.

The big thing is that the default template changed completely between  
2.4 and 2.6, so this is a difficult way.

However, since the JSP tags were not changed that much, any 2.4- 
compliant template should still work in 2.6.  However, you obviously  
lose all the cool stuff.  But it should still work (and let me know  
if it does not).

/Janne

On 27 Sep 2007, at 18:03, Eric Ladner wrote:

> Crap.. Hit the wrong button...   Sorry for the short post below.
>
> If you followed the rules below, you just need to compare the
> differences between major chunks of any of the jsp's you've modified
> in your template directory (assuming that you like your template
> structure and look/feel).   Any major changes in the 2.6 templates
> might require some adjustment to your template, but nothing that
> couldn't be synced up in a day, I'd think.
>
> On 9/27/07, Eric Ladner <[email protected]> wrote:
>> If you followed Janne's rules
>>
>> On 9/26/07, Janne Jalkanen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rule #1 on template writing: create your own template directory, and
>>> put your modified files in there.  Do not modify the default  
>>> template.
>>>
>>> Rule #2: put only modified files in your own template directory (and
>>> CSS).  JSPWiki will check your template directory for any given JSP
>>> file, and if that does not exist, it'll try to use the one from the
>>> "default" directory.  So you can change your entire layout by simply
>>> adding your own ViewTemplate.jsp file, nothing more.
>>>
>>> All template files have changed between 2.4 and 2.6.
>>>
>>> /janne
>>>
> -- 
> Eric Ladner
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Jspwiki-users mailing list, in which we discuss the
> stable release (even-numbered, 2.4.x, 2.6.x), and user-issues.
> For development discussion, please join jspwiki-dev.
> http://ecyrd.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jspwiki-users
> http://www.jspwiki.org/JSPWikiMailingList