Re: More accurate wording for java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.sleep
Martin Buchholz via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jsr.166-concurrency |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+kOe08Wpsj4npu4v1kf=cCc=395CBE-pKas0zYxwjZk0Wj3gA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 10:43 AM Pavel Rappo <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 6:00 PM Martin Buchholz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I've been a steady advocate of "at least" semantics for methods that > specify a duration, including sleep. > > > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6313903 > > Then it seems like you are in favor of changing the Thread.sleep spec. > Here's the 2005 version of Martin agreeing with you! https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-5068368?focusedCommentId=12148372&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-12148372 _______________________________________________ Concurrency-interest mailing list [email protected] http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest