Re: Low-latency pause in JDK
Francesco Nigro via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jsr.166-concurrency |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKxGtTUagEO-cYqhsTJarbdfqk=m_F6qURZnEkw8QrLWdP_KWA@mail.gmail.com> |
I was hoping that for parking times < granularity offered by the OS would make sense a mm_pause (possibility not broken) spin loop while using rdts to measure the elapsed time (+ lfence, if needed, but maybe with the pause isn't necessary). And no safepoint polls in the spin wait loop. I know that on oversubscribed systems (more active threads then core) isn't a great solution but would be nice to have some way to perform a low latency sleep. Implementing by myself saving the safepoint poll to be injected in an uncounted loop is not that trivial... Il sab 26 ott 2019, 11:23 Andrew Haley via Concurrency-interest < [email protected]> ha scritto: > On 10/25/19 11:11 AM, Viktor Klang via Concurrency-interest wrote: > > > > Is there any jdk-builtin Java8+ method which tries to be clever > > about low-nanos/micros parking? > > > > I'm currently considering LockSupport.parkNanos but want to avoid > > having the Thread parked when parking + wake-up latency is more > > likely to be much greater than the requested time. > > > > I.e. some combination of onSpinWait + some non-cache-polluting > > computation + yielding + actual parking. I'd like to avoid having to > > custom-roll it, hence the question for prior art ;) > > As I understand it, the common wisdom is to wait for about half the > round-trip time for a system call and then park. It doesn't sound > terribly hard to write something to do that. > > Please forgive me for digressing, but: > > Arm has a mechanism to do this, WFE. When a core fails to obtain a > lock it executes a WFE instruction which waits on the cache line > containing the lock. When that cache line is written to by the core > releasing the lock it awakens the waiting core. > > I'd like to find some way to expose this in a high-level language but > it's not at all easy to do. > > I believe that Intel has MWAIT which is similar, but it's a privileged > instruction so no use to us. > > -- > Andrew Haley (he/him) > Java Platform Lead Engineer > Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com> > https://keybase.io/andrewhaley > EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671 > > _______________________________________________ > Concurrency-interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest > _______________________________________________ Concurrency-interest mailing list [email protected] http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest