Re: Low-latency pause in JDK
Doug Lea via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jsr.166-concurrency |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/26/19 2:42 PM, Francesco Nigro via Concurrency-interest wrote: >> For example, I have later removed > nearly every occurrence of Thread.yield() in any code I've written after > finding something better or more general > > OT: Just curious, where? :) Notice for example that as of the rewrites last summer, there are none in all of java.util.concurrent.locks.* Much further off-topic, I was reminded of this when seeing "Ants Are Practically Immune to Traffic Jams" courtesy of Hacker News a few days ago (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21352345) https://www.sciencealert.com/ant-roads-are-practically-immune-to-traffic-jams-even-when-it-gets-crowded Perhaps we can devise some pheromone-based synchronization primitives... -Doug _______________________________________________ Concurrency-interest mailing list [email protected] http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest