Re: ManagedBlocker.block() documentation

Doug Lea via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.jsr.166-concurrency
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 10/30/19 9:58 AM, Tim Peierls via Concurrency-interest wrote:
> "return" -> "returns" ?

Right; thanks. Plus we can further simplify as:

     * Neither method is invoked after a prior invocation
     * of {@code isReleasable} or {@code block} returns {@code true}.

> 
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019, 9:50 AM Doug Lea via Concurrency-interest
> <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     On 10/30/19 3:23 AM, Roman Leventov via Concurrency-interest wrote:
>     > Currently, ManagedBlocker's documentation doesn't clarify whether the
>     > execution framework could call block() more than once or not. The
>     > specification for the return value of block() method:
> 
>     This seems implicit in the interface-level description, but we'll add a
>     clarification:
> 
>          * Method {@code block} is not invoked after a prior invocation of
>          * {@code isReleasable} or {@code block} return {@code true}.
>          *
> 
>     -Doug
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Concurrency-interest mailing list
>     [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest
> 


_______________________________________________
Concurrency-interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.