Re: draft Carrier API
Doug Lea via Concurrency-interest <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Mar 2020 08:50:31 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jsr.166-concurrency |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/8/20 6:59 PM, Kasper Nielsen wrote: > Just a quick comment, > I would much prefer if Carrier stuck with using the standard [long > timeout, TimeUnit unit] > used throughout java.util.concurrent. Instead of adopting Duration for > a single class. > Right. Actually, include both. I listed it without TimeUnit overloads mainly as a check that we'd get responses confirming that current BlockingQueue etc users would consider Carrier as an alternative. (See updates at http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/wwwtmp/Carrier.java) -Doug _______________________________________________ Concurrency-interest mailing list [email protected] http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest