Re: Re: New step-until-code-is-available feature request (was: call for input, votes)

Yes, but I didn't realize that "exclude" existed until I'd already 
written most of the message and decided to double-chcek the help to make 
sure that there wasn't already some way of doing it.. ;)

Thought I'd throw it out there anyway and see what you all thought...

Just tried it, and "exclude javax.*" does do exactly what I want. The 
step-until-code-is-available feature would be only syntactic sugar for 
this same functionality.



Nathan Fiedler wrote:
> Wouldn't using the 'exclude' command to exclude "javax.*" solve this
> problem? While I do not object to the auto-exclude feature, it just
> seems like there is already a perfectly good solution.
> 
> n
>