Re: call for input, votes

Sorry, I was pretty sure I'd seen 'runto' not deleting the breakpoint.
I'll check again and log the bug if I confirm it.

ile -- I think it's basically the same as rlwrap, but if memory serves I
couldn't get rlwrap to compile for some reason.  ile also doesn't seem to
have a home page; I gathered from some poking around that it may have
originated as part of a suite of tools with FreeBSD or something.

I think this is where I originally found it:
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/misc.html#ile-2.0_1

I saved a copy on our company computers because I wasn't convinced that
was going to be accessible forever.

Matthias



On 12 Jun 2002, Nathan Fiedler wrote:

> I've marked 407 as a duplicate of 265 -- you'll have to vote for 265
> instead of 407. Sorry, age takes precedence in this case.
> 
> The runto command is supposed to delete its breakpoint once it is hit.
> It utilizes the "expireCount" and "deleteOnExpire" properties of the
> breakpoint. The breakpoint must be hit once and then it will be deleted.
> If this isn't, it's a bug.
> 
> By all means, log bugs.
> 
> Is there a URL that I could link to for the ile program? Is it just like
> rlwrap?
> 
> Thanks for voting.
> 
> n
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 16:39, Matthias Ferber wrote:
> > Nathan,
> > 
> > I've exercised my rights as a citizen of JSwatistan and voted.  Couple of
> > questions and other items:
> > 
> > a) #407 and #265 seem to be the same thing (implied *. in unqualified
> > classnames).  I voted for #407 because it's the one with my name in it.
> > Re. the comments in #265, I wonder if it's possible to check classes
> > against wildcards when they're loaded?  That would eliminate the problem
> > of having to scan the classpath directories looking for matching files
> > (which I agree is a bad idea under any circumstances).  If not, perhaps
> > the *. could still be implied on already-loaded classes -- isn't that how
> > it works now with the explicit *.?
> > 
> > b) Can you perhaps add a new bug for me?  (I don't know if you want us
> > adding new ones directly?)  I'd like the 'runto' command to clear the
> > breakpoint it sets once it's reached -- a one-time breakpoint, in effect.
> > Usually I use that just to find my way through code, not to set permanent
> > breakpoints.  [If this is already implemented, sorry -- I'm a few versions
> > back because we're not using 1.4 yet.]
> > 
> > Once the bug is posted I'll use my 10th vote for it.
> > 
> > c) Re. #389, the readline RFE, I've had great success with a command line
> > tool called ile.  There are others, but this was the one I was able to
> > compile on our system (it's platform-dependent, of course).  If you want
> > to post the tgz file, I could send it to you -- it's a bit hard to find on
> > the net.
> > 
> > Anyway, thanks for promoting the voting!  It's a good idea.
> > Matthias
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jswat-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.bluemarsh.com/mailman/listinfo/jswat-user
>