Re: antlib

David,

I don't know of anyone working on such a thing, but it would likely be
valuable.  Would you like to give it a whirl?  Thanks,

   David Saff

On 8/27/07, J. David Beutel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is anyone working on an antlib for JUnit?  The support for JUnit 4 in
> Ant 1.7 is OK, but could stand some improvements in the reporting, e.g.,
> for @Ignore, the 4.4 assumptions, the way it continues to simulate the
> distinction between failure and error, and a timezone for the timestamps.
>
> Cheers,
> 11011011
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Junit-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/junit-devel
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/