Re: Adding @NonParameterized

Would it be possible to quickly code up a test showing the new runner
in action?  Thanks,

   David

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Marius Kruger <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I've just discovered and fell in love with Parameterized tests (with:
> @RunWith(value = Parameterized.class) )
>
> However in the first two use cases I have I have tests that does not
> use the parameterization
> mixed in with test that do use it (in the same class).
> I don't seem to be the only one missing this feature:
> http://stackoverflow.com/q/3361239/381083
>
> It appears that TestNG does not suffer from this problem.
> http://techinsides.blogspot.com/2010/09/dont-tie-yourself-up-parameterized.html
>
> I'm not so desperate to switch to TestNG, so I modified the builtin
> Parameterized class to support this feature (see attached).
> Just annotate applicable tests as @NonParameterized. Note that this
> class only works with its on annotations, i.e. check your imports.
>
> If this has any chance of getting merged into junit I can turn it into
> a branch add tests and documentation etc. let me know.
>
> --
> regards
> <>< Marius ><>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Junit-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/junit-devel
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev