Re: Feedback requested: Impending changes to RunListener

Hi Stephen,

The correct groupId is com.github.stephenc.jcip.
I already intalled and used the junit lib 4.12-snapshot in other project.

The text in @ThreadSafe is similar to the one in original jcip.
Although i would omit mentioning modifier "public" since the all problem of thread safety is in fields which are read or write in critical section=methods/constructor. So the modifier may not necessarily be public. It can be also protected, etc.
So better not to mention any modifier in the text.

Let's wait for other repliers and then to make a new deployment.

Cheers,
Tibor


--- In [email protected], Stephen Connolly  wrote:
>
> To allow for the removal of licensing concerns, I have clean-room reverse
> engineered the jcip-annotations as well:
> https://github.com/stephenc/jcip-annotations
> 
> Should be available from Central in the next 1-8 hours
> 
> 
>   com.github.stephenc 
>   jcip-annotations 
>   1.0-1 
> 
> 
> This should be a drop in replacement for
> 
> 
>     net.jcip 
>     jcip-annotations 
>     1.0 
> 
> 
> But if it isn't please let me know and I can fix and roll a 1.0-2
> 
> 
> On 13 February 2013 09:17, Stephen Connolly
  > wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > On 13 February 2013 01:17, Kevin Cooney  wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:14 PM, tibord47  wrote:
> >>
> >>> **
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> ok, so in that case the standard javax annotations cannot be used.
> >>>
> >>> Other options are jcip and proprietary one.
> >>>
> >> There are a few other options that were suggested. I've summarized them
> >> all here:
> >>
> >>
> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OeE5OUKgtkKHeQuA7bKldBTk-yQ83bH6BHokwifCPrE/edit#
> >>
> >> Feel free to add comments if I missed something. If you don't have a
> >> Google account (or even if you do) feel free to continue to comment here.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I vote for jcip since the license allows us to use a dependency.
> >>>
> >> Stephen indicated a concern with the jcip-annotations license. Hopefully
> >> he (or someone else with a concern) can explain why the license is
> >> problematic.
> >>
> >
> > I indicated that there may be a concern with the license and you'd want to
> > check.
> >
> > We had (at former employers) an issue with the findbugs annotations
> > (LGPL), so I created https://github.com/stephenc/findbugs-annotations as
> > a clean-room reverse engineered implementation (Apache License v2) of the
> > same annotations specification.
> >
> > We weren't using the jcip-annotations, so those were not subject to the
> > lawyers reviewing.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> -- Kevin
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/junit/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/junit/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/