Re: Annotation driven Junit Test cases

You need to fork the junit repo on github and file a pull request. I do not
like the idea too much, tho. It puts a lot of waste in the code and i dont
believe in many use-cases where a test case is that simple.
Am 24.04.2013 12:50 schrieb "sourabh" <[email protected]>:

> Hi,
>
> My team has recently started work on trying to extend Junit to support all
> inclusive annotation driven testing of a method in Java.
>
> What I mean is that if we have a method
>
> public int add(int a ,int b)
>
> then, instead of having to write a separate class for testing it, we would
> like to annotate the method as follows
>
> @AutoTest
> @InputParams
> @AutoAssert
> public int add(int a,int b)
>
> The responsibility of setting up junit to understand and execute this set
> of annotation would be delegated t our custom Runner.
>
> The example above is quite basic as we plan to support testing for complex
> input objects that are seeded using an XML file.
>
> We are in pretty advanced stages of completing this implementation. Please
> let me know how can we share our code for approvals/reviews with the Junit
> community.
>
> Thanks,
> SG
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/junit/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/junit/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/