Re: Re: Alternate @Category annotations

I'm with Kristian: don't implement such a thing in surefire, but not in
JUnit.

I think the Suggestion that Dale proposed is great. But it is a JUnit
Feature Request, not a surefire feature request.

Greetings,
   Malte


On 29 May 2013 08:15, <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> --- In [email protected], Dale Emery <dale@...> wrote:
> >> One possibility (that I'm toying with an another domain) is to use >a
> meta-annotation like @CategoryAnnotation.  Any annotation that is >itself
> annotated with @CategoryAnnotation is a category annotation.
>
> I think this sounds great. But Shouldn't the @CategoryAnnotation itself be
> part of Junit ? The filtering bit could well be delegated to various
> runners..?
>
> Kristian
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/junit/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/junit/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/